Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2008 6:24 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Attorney General, teachers union settle dues dispute  December 3

Gregoire "declined" job with Obama  December 2

Speaking of departures, Fish and Wildlife leader quits  December 2

State’s early learning director resigns   December 2

Rep. O'Brien says this will be his last term  November 26

Archives:
LINKS:

Local
Island County
Snohomish County

State
Governor
Legislature
Secretary of State

U.S.
House of Representatives
Senate
White House

Useful Resources
Federal Election Commission
Public Disclosure Commission
Thomas (federal legislation tracking)
TVW
RECENT COLUMNS:
New goal: Get the college, then a site  November 30
Mark Hintz has sights on statewide leadership  November 16
Second time is transit's charm  November 9
Rossi and Gregoire differ on local UW  October 19
 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Petri Dish


 
ADVERTISEMENT

 

This just in: I-1029 to stay on ballot


Posted at 9:56 am by Jerry Cornfield

Secretary of State Sam Reed's staff just issued a press release saying the state Supreme Court has issued a decision that leaves Initiative 1029 on the November ballot.

"We greatly appreciate the Supreme Court’s prompt and timely consideration and decision in this case,” State Elections Director Nick Handy states in the release.

The measure, if passed, would require long-term care workers to pass a certification examination, complete more training and undergo background checks.

As the secretary of state's office noted, the initiative petitions contained a mistake by including language suggesting that this was an initiative to the Legislature rather than an initiative to the people.

Secretary of State Sam Reed and his Elections Division reviewed all circumstances of the initiative and decided, based on advice from the Attorney General’s Office, to accept the petitions as being in substantial compliance with the law, according to the press release.

Opponents of the measure sued to get the initiative removed and cited the error on the petitions as the main reason. Justices heard the case Thursday.
READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click here.
Click here to see all The Petri Dish comments
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
  Return to The Petri Dish
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT